FIR registered against Nirmal Baba under various sections Will he be arrested?

FIR registered against Nirmal Baba under various sections
Will he be arrested?

Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) Rajesh Upadhyaya on May 9 had directed Gomti Nagar police to register a case against the godman.



two children - Tanya Thakur and Aditya Thakur The applicants alleged that Baba was fooling lakhs of people by creating fear of religion and his acts were promoting superstition.

They accused Nirmala Baba of cheating the poor and illiterate people who come with their problems in these meetings.

The petitioners alleged that a fee of Rs 2000 was being charged from every person attending the darbar.

The court in its order said that the submission made by the applicants regarding Nirmal Baba was surely against the scientific and logical thinking of humans and falls in the category of misleading the society, superstition and cheating.

The court said that allowing entry into 'samagams' by depositing money directly into account and giving baseless and superstitions solutions amounts is not only cheating individual but the entire society and this act should be probed.

The Lucknow Police today registered a case of cheating and fraud against controversial godman Nirmaljeet Singh Nerula alias Nirmal Baba.

The case against Nirmal Baba has been registered under various Sections of the IPC, including 417, 419, 420 and 508.

In this case now FIR is registered.
Now police will investigate the case and then they will report the findings to the Court.
Police may ask the questions to Nirmal Baba regarding this case.

Know about IPC sections registered against Nirmal Baba

Indian Penal Code (IPC) 

Section 417. Punishment for cheating

Whoever cheats shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.

CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCE –

Punishment—Imprisonment for 1 year, or fine, or both—Non-cogniza­ble—Bailable—Triable by any Magistrate—Compoundable by the person cheated with the permission of the court.

Section 419. Punishment for cheating by personation


Whoever cheats by personation shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.   
CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCE



Punishment—Imprisonment for 3 years, or fine, or both—Cognizable—Bailable—Triable by any Magistrate—Compoundable by the person cheated with the permission of the court.

Indian Penal Code (IPC)

Section 420. Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property

Whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable of being converted into a valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.

CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCE

Punishment—Imprisonment for 7 years and fine—Cognizable—Non-boilable —Triable by Magistrate of the first class—Compoundable by the person cheated with the permission of the court.

Comments

Ingredients

(i) Even if the allegation made in the complaint are accepted to be true and correct, the appellants cannot be said to have committed any offence of cheating. Since the appellants were not in picture at all the time when the complainant alleges to have spent money in improving the bottling plant, neither any guilty intention can be attributed to them nor there can possibly be any intention on their part to deceive complainant; Ajay Mitra v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 2003 SC 1069.

(ii) The offence of cheating is established when the accused thereby induced that person to deliver any property or to do or to omit to do something which he would otherwise not have done or omitted; Mahadeo Prasad v. State of Bengal, AIR 1954 SC 724.
Indian Penal Code (IPC)


Section 508. Act caused by inducing person to believe that he will be rendered an object of the Divine displeasure



Whoever voluntarily causes or attempts to cause any person to do anything which that person is not legally bound to do, or to omit to do anything which he is legally entitled to do, by inducing or attempting to induce that person to believe that he or any person in whom he is interested will become or will be rendered by some act of the offender an object of Divine displeasure if he does not do the thing which it is the object of the offender to cause him to do, or if he does the thing which it is the object of the offender to cause him to omit, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a tem which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.



Illustrations



(a) A sits dharna at Z's door with the intention of causing it to be believed that, by so sitting, he renders Z an object of Divine displeasure. A has committed the offence defined in this section.



(b) A threatens Z that, unless Z performs a certain act, A will kill one of A's own children, under such circumstances that the killing would be believed to render Z an object of Divine displeasure. A has committed the offence defined in this section.



CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCE



Punishment—Imprisonment for 1 year, or fine, or both—Non-cogniza­ble—Bailable—Triable by any Magistrate—Compoundable by the person against whom the offence was committed.

Suggested Reading –

Know 33 Facts about Nirmal Baba The Third Eye Nirmal Baba Biography

http://realityviews.blogspot.in/2012/04/know-33-facts-about-nirmal-baba-third.html

Reality views by sm –

Saturday, May 12, 2012

Tags – FIR NIRMAL BABA