26 May 2011

Pin It

High Court issued Notice to Govt advocate filed PIL to include SC/ST member in Lokpal Drafting committee –

High Court issued Notice to Govt advocate filed PIL to
include SC/ST member in Lokpal Drafting committee –

M Palanimuthu, an advocate, filed the PIL seeking a direction to the Union Government to re-constitute the Joint Drafting Committee of Lokpal Bill with due representation to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and Women.



The petitioner submitted that he had come to know that many members of Parliament, intellectuals, social workers and women rights activities have sent many petitions to the Government of India and Chairman of the Joint Drafting Committee of the Lokpal Bill in this regard.

Palanimuthu said that till date, four meetings of the joint drafting committee of Lokpal bill had been held without representation of SCs/STs and women.

These meetings were "totally meaningless and incomplete for the purpose" and proceedings of the committee should be stopped immediately, the petitioner demanded.

After that The Madras High Court today ordered notice to the Union Government on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking to include a civil society activist from Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee.

When the matter came up before the Bench of Justices S Rajeswaran and K B K Vasuki, the Additional Solicitor General took notice on behalf of the Union of India.

Before this another PIL was also filed regarding demand to include a civil society activist from south India.

Now High court will hear both the Public Interest Ligation Petition on June 9.

Do you think both the PIL are good?

Both the PIL has no merit in this case.

Its waste of time, money and resources.

Lokpal bill Panel members gave opportunity to Every Indian to submit their demands before them.

If anyone wants to say anything he can do it.

I just see this demand as a stunt to get the publicity.

If Government agrees to this demand then
we have to include every caste and religion, then we have to include one person from each state.

Just its foolishness.

High Court should have dismissed this PIL on the first day itself.

No Merit in this Case.


Reality views by sm –
May 26, 2011

Keyword Tag – Lokpal Bill PIL Caste SC/ST

8 comments:

Anonymous,  May 27, 2011  

I feel women member should be there. Because corruption may mean different for a woman.

sm,  May 27, 2011  

Anonymous,,
thanks.
Sorry I do not agree with you.
Corruption is same for everyone.

Anonymous,  May 27, 2011  

What you are talking about is monetary corruption.

What about corruption happening by offering call girls and all?

Anonymous,  May 27, 2011  

I do not want to unnecessarily argue.

If the Lokpal is a good idea, then PIL is not bad either.

sm,  May 27, 2011  

Anonymous,,
thanks
Males also work as call boys and girls also work as call girls.
so its same for everyone.

sm,  May 27, 2011  

Anonymous,
Thanks
Lokpal and PIL are two different things.PIL is always caused based one cause I may support and one cause I may not support.

Example - PIL for economic reservation I support.
PIL for the certain caste and religion I do not support.

Lokpal will act as agency which will try and prosecute corrupt people without fear of government officers and politicians.

Hope you got the point.

Anonymous,  May 27, 2011  

It is not the same, sm. Girls can give birth to children. Boys don't. It is much riskier for girls because there may be pregnancy. Like it happened in ND Tiwari case.

sm,  May 27, 2011  

Anonymous,,
thanks.
Its same you are confusing it.
Its the fault of lady she did not told him to use condom and neither she took the pills.