26 March 2013

Pin It

Know 21 Reasons Why Sanjay Dutt should not be given Pardon No Pardon to Sanjay Dutt

Know 21  Reasons Why Sanjay Dutt should not be given Pardon No Pardon to Sanjay Dutt

Supreme Court of India found Sanjay Dutt guilty and now few people have started a campaign to save Sanjay Dutt.

Know - Article 161 in The Constitution Of India 1949

161. Power of Governor to grant pardons, etc, and to suspend, remit or commute sentences in certain cases The Governor of a State shall have the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence against any law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the State extends

First Know Who is Sanjay Dutt

Sanjay Dutt is a son of Politician

Sanjay Dutt is a son of rich parents

Sanjay Dutt is a Bollywood star, I am also fan of Sanjay Dutt, and I love his movies.

Sanjay Dutt his sister is a politician.

Dutt, charged with possessing an AK-56 rifle and destroying it with the help of friends

According to CBI, co-accused Baba Musa Chohan, Samir Hingora and Hanif Kadawala had gone to Dutt's Bandra residence at the instance of prime conspirator Anees Ibrahim and delivered weapons to the actor. He allegedly retained one AK-56 rifle and returned the rest which were then delivered at the house of co-accused Zebunissa Kazi.

Dutt is also charged with destroying the weapon with the help of his friends Yusuf Nullwala, Ajay Marwah, Kersi Adajania and Rusi Mulla.

The CBI said Dutt was shooting in Mauritius when he learnt about his complicity from media reports and allegedly asked his friends to go to his house and destroy the weapon.

In his confession that he later retracted, the actor said mafia don Abu Salem visited his home in January 1993 with Samir Hingora and Hanif Kadawala, proprietors of Magnum Video and alleged close associates of underworld don Dawood Ibrahim.

He was charged under the stringent Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act
or TADA for conspiracy in the blasts and receiving weapons from Abu Salem.
Mr. Dutt was acquitted under TADA, convicted under the milder Arms Act and handed a six-year jail sentence.

11] Mumbai police caught Sanjay Dutt talking to underworld don Chota Shakeel in Year 2000

Following are 21 Reasons No Pardon for Sanjay Dutt

In Bombay serial blast we know that 257, people died, if anyone of children who is 20 years old today goes and murders an elected Politician for their failure to protect Bombay from terror attack will you forgive him for this murder.

If same boy who planned to murder a politician is caught by Police will you pardon him?

If a common is found in possession of such dangerous weapon which were found at Sanjay Dutt house, what will happen with that Common citizen of India?

Case was delayed so what, it is an Indian style of justice, here divorce case also takes 20 years So what, If you are Indian citizen you should accept the Indian judicial working system which means majority times, delayed justice.

People say because of 20 years delay Sanjay Dutt suffered lot

In this 20 years of period,  he got married, he got 2 kids is it suffering or pleasure

Having kids is it a suffering or Pleasure

Getting married is it a suffering or pleasure

A chance and time to get to work in Movies is it suffering or pleasure

Sanjay Dutt got paid, he received money when he worked in movies like Munnabhai and Khalnayak and many more, With money Sanjay Dutt got respect and love from Indian citizens even if he was the accused in Bombay Blast Case

Just think Sanjay Dutt was acquitted in Tada Case. why the CBI did not challenge Mr. Dutt's acquittal
Baba Mussa Chauhan and Magnum video owner Samir Hingora - who went to Dutt's house to deliver the consignment of arms. Similarly, there were others like Manzoor Ahmed, whose car was used to bring back the weapons from Dutt's residence, and an old woman (Zaibunissa Kazi), who kept the consignment in her house for a few days.
Each of them -
Kazi -
All were convicted under TADA (Terrorists and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act).

But comedy is that Dutt was not convicted under TADA.
He was only convicted under Arms Act.

Many People think that because of Political Pressure CBI did not Appeal against Sanjay Dutt acquittal.

Just Think this - How is it that all the accused get convicted in one kind of case and only one is tried under a different one?"
Sunil Dutt the father of Sanjay Dutt met the Shiv Sena supreme Balasaheb Thackeray
To save Sanjay Dutt.

Thackeray then told to Sunil Dutt that he will help them.

Sunil Dutt did not contest consecutive elections to keep a promise given to Thackeray.

Sanjay's lawyer Satish Maneshinde in an interview to NDTV 24x7 said that
After the Sena-BJP came to power in Maharashtra in 1995, Thackeray got the government to set up a state-level board to review TADA cases.

The board passed an order in Sanjay's favor, but the TADA court rejected it.

Thackeray then rang up the Congress Prime Minister, P.V. Narasimha Rao, and lobbied for Sanjay, Maneshinde recalled in the interview. He said he and Sanjay were at Thackeray's home when the Sena chief dialled Rao.

Rao promised to include Sanjay's case among those to be sent up before an upcoming central review committee for TADA cases.

The panel recommended bail for the actor. The TADA charges against him were dropped, freeing him from the blast conspiracy charge, and only the Arms Act case for possessing AK rifles remained.

Purpose of Justice is to teach a lesson and set an example before the society that if you do xyz thing this will happen to You

Remember The God of Maharashtra Shivaji – When King Shivaji saw that his elder son is becoming bad he gave him imprisonment in year 1678, The point is that King Shivaji punished everyone for his or her crime.

US -  A case the conviction of millionaire Rajat Gupta for insider trading in US  people said he was very good but still he got punishment.
Mike Tyson, Lindsay Lohan, Wesley Snipes, Legendary boxing promoter Don King and many more got punishments in US 

Story From Mahabharat Epic from India – Four  People murder a man who are they? Good Man or Priest, Businessman, Warrior, and Criminal. In this case Yudhisthir gives death punishment to the Priest, good man, says that a priest is learned one, and knows murder is sin. Yet he committed the sin so he must be punished. Whereas criminal does not have proper discretion of good and bad.

Using same Principle that accused suffered 20 years , we need to find all such cases and give pardon to all accused in all cases

Objective of the Justice System is to set the examples by giving punishments.

If Sanjay Dutt is Pardoned what message it will sent to the society.

What is duty of  Indian citizen if he knows that XYZ people have brought  dangerous weapons and handgranades in his town,  To inform Police or to get the one weapon from them for whatever may be the reason

Reality views by sm –

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Tags – Sanjay Dutt Pardon Black White


Usha March 26, 2013  

Thanks for all details about Sanjay Dutt's involvement in Mumbai blast...he was in a bad company who wished harm to India..so he has to face the consequences. I think he should happily go to jail and serve his jail time..time flies fast...he can return and become Munnabhai in real life.

Renu March 26, 2013  

I feel anguished when I see respected people of the society defending a criminal and dishonouring our supreme court..what type of society we are making..

deeps March 26, 2013  

that makes sense

Rama Ananth March 26, 2013  

Under our law everybody is not equal, that is the moral of the story. He should go to jail, but will he, that is big question

virendra sharma March 26, 2013  

Pardon granted to Dutt would imply India maintains two types of laws one for the common man the other for the well connected with social networking .

There is a board at the Wagah border which says ,'India the largest democracy in the world Welcomes

you,A line should be added to it ,But a petty man who acts as an agent of power and is appointed to topple the govts of opposition parties in states can supersede the supreme court .

rudraprayaga March 26, 2013  

Law and order is only for the under privileged, but still if truth speaks he was not indulged in conspiracy he and the like may be condoned.

MEcoy March 26, 2013  

such a great post sm

Anonymous,  March 26, 2013  

All necessary correct information is revealed so heshould be not pardoned or given pardon, consider if common person is guilt will all this consider him to be ---

Destination Infinity March 26, 2013  

I wonder why the media is suddenly taking a lenient position on this issue? Why should a former Supreme court judge write a letter requesting to pardon someone? How or why has this issue become a "cause"?

You have raised good points in your post, SM.

Destination Infinity

ra March 27, 2013  

the main accused Daud Ibrahim is still not convicted .. so we cannot say that except sanjay dutt all are convicted ..

Sandhya March 27, 2013  

I am still not able to digest the news that Justice Katju is supporting him!

BK Chowla, March 28, 2013  

I my peronal opinion,it must be left as an issue between Sanjay and the law