08 May 2025

Know How S400 Missiles works and destroyes enemy fighters stealth aircraft

Know How S400 Missiles works and destroyes enemy fighters stealth aircraft

The S-400 is a networked, layered air defense system that integrates multiple components—radars, command centers, missile launchers, and various missile types—to provide comprehensive protection. 
Its operation involves detection, tracking, targeting, and engagement, all coordinated in real time. 

Here’s a breakdown of the process:

1. Components of the S-400 System

Radars:  
91N6E Big Bird: A 3D phased-array radar with a 600 km detection range for early warning and tracking of aircraft, missiles, and drones. It can track up to 300 targets simultaneously.

92N6E Grave Stone: A fire-control radar that guides missiles to targets, with a range of ~400 km for precise tracking and engagement.

Optional Radars: Systems like the 96L6E (high-altitude detection) or third-party radars (e.g., Nebo-M) can be integrated for enhanced coverage.

Electronic Warfare Support: Systems like Moscow-1 and Orion provide passive detection and jamming to counter enemy radar and stealth technology.

Command and Control (C2):  
The 55K6E command post coordinates all components, processing radar data, assigning targets, and relaying firing commands. It uses automated algorithms to prioritize threats and optimize engagements.

The C2 can integrate with other air defense systems (e.g., S-300, Pantsir) for a layered defense network.


Launchers:  
5P85TE2/5P85SE2: Mobile launch vehicles (based on BAZ-64022 trucks) carry 4–16 missiles per launcher, depending on missile type. A typical battalion has 7–8 launchers.

Launchers are highly mobile, deployable in 5 minutes, and can operate independently or in a network.

Missiles:
The S-400 uses four missile types, each optimized for specific threats:  
40N6: 400 km range, 30 km altitude, for long-range targets like AWACS, bombers, or stealth aircraft.

48N6DM: 250 km range, for aircraft, cruise missiles, and medium-range ballistic missiles.

9M96E2: 120 km range, for agile targets like fighter jets or drones.

9M96E: 40 km range, for short-range, low-altitude threats.

Future 77N6 missiles (in development) will use hit-to-kill technology for ballistic missile defense.

2. Operational Process

The S-400 operates in a seamless, automated cycle to detect and neutralize threats:
Detection:  
The Big Bird radar scans the airspace, detecting targets up to 600 km away, even stealth aircraft with low radar cross-sections. It identifies targets by speed, altitude, and trajectory (e.g., ballistic vs. aerodynamic).

Passive sensors (e.g., Moscow-1) detect enemy radar emissions, reducing reliance on active radar and avoiding enemy anti-radiation missiles.

Data is sent to the command post, which filters out non-threats (e.g., civilian aircraft) using IFF (Identification Friend or Foe) systems.

Tracking and Prioritization:  
The Grave Stone radar locks onto prioritized targets, providing continuous updates on their position, speed, and trajectory. It can track up to 100 targets and guide missiles to 36–80 simultaneously (depending on configuration).

The command post assigns targets to specific launchers, selecting the optimal missile type based on range, altitude, and target characteristics (e.g., 40N6 for distant AWACS, 9M96E2 for agile jets).

Engagement:  
The launcher fires the missile, which is “cold-launched” (ejected vertically by gas before igniting its motor) to minimize launch signature and enable 360-degree coverage.

Missiles use active radar homing (self-guided) or semi-active radar homing (guided by ground radar) to track targets. For example:  
40N6: Uses active radar to engage targets at 400 km, ideal for non-maneuvering targets like bombers.  

9M96E2: Employs inertial guidance with mid-course updates and active radar for terminal homing, allowing it to hit agile targets with a 20g maneuverability.

The missile travels at hypersonic speeds (up to 4.8 km/s or Mach 14) to intercept targets quickly.

Interception:  
The missile detonates a high-explosive fragmentation warhead (e.g., 180 kg for 48N6DM) near the target, destroying it with shrapnel. For ballistic missiles, the blast must be precise to disrupt the warhead’s trajectory.

For future 77N6 missiles, hit-to-kill technology will directly collide with the target, similar to the U.S. Patriot PAC-3.

The system can fire salvos (multiple missiles per target) to ensure a high kill probability, especially against evasive or stealth targets.

Post-Engagement:  
The command post assesses the outcome using radar data. If the target is not destroyed, additional missiles can be fired.

The system repositions or reloads (each launcher carries spare missiles) to prepare for further threats.

3. Key Features in Combat
Multi-Target Engagement: Can engage 36–80 targets simultaneously, making it effective against saturation attacks (e.g., multiple drones or cruise missiles).

Anti-Stealth Capability: Advanced radars and passive sensors detect low-observable targets like F-35s or B-2s, though effectiveness depends on range and countermeasures.

Ballistic Missile Defense: Can intercept short- and medium-range ballistic missiles (up to 3,500 km range, 2 km/s speed), though it’s less effective than dedicated systems like THAAD.

Electronic Warfare Resistance: Integrates jammers and decoys to counter enemy SEAD (Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses) tactics and anti-radiation missiles.

Network Integration: Links with other defenses (e.g., Pantsir for short-range protection, A-50 AWACS for extended detection) to create a layered air defense network.

How the S-400 Fights in Combat

In a combat scenario, the S-400’s role is to protect critical assets (e.g., cities, military bases, or troops) by creating a defensive “bubble” up to 400 km in radius. Here’s what happens during a typical engagement:
Scenario Example: Defending Against an Air Attack

Threat Detection:  
An enemy strike package (e.g., fighter jets, cruise missiles, and drones) approaches a Russian airbase in Syria. The Big Bird radar detects them at 500 km, identifying their type and trajectory.

The command post classifies the jets as high-priority (e.g., F-16s carrying precision bombs) and assigns cruise missiles to shorter-range Pantsir systems for efficiency.

Engagement Decision:  
The Grave Stone radar locks onto the F-16s at 300 km. The command post selects 48N6DM missiles for their 250 km range and assigns two missiles per jet to ensure destruction.

For a stealthy cruise missile detected at 100 km, a 9M96E2 missile is chosen for its precision and maneuverability.

Missile Launch:  
Launchers fire vertically, and missiles climb to intercept altitude. The 48N6DM missiles accelerate to Mach 14, guided by mid-course radar updates from Grave Stone.

The 9M96E2 uses active radar homing to chase the cruise missile, adjusting for evasive maneuvers.

Interception:  
At 50 km from the base, the 48N6DM missiles detonate near the F-16s, destroying them with shrapnel. The radar confirms the kills.

The 9M96E2 intercepts the cruise missile at 20 km, preventing it from reaching the base.

Outcome:  
The base is protected, and the S-400 repositions to avoid counterstrikes. The command post updates its threat database, preparing for follow-up attacks.

Russia-Ukraine War (2022–Present):  
Successes: Early in the conflict, S-400s in Crimea and eastern Ukraine restricted Ukrainian aircraft to low altitudes, reducing their effectiveness. 
Russian sources claimed in 2023 that S-400s downed Ukrainian Su-27s and Storm Shadow missiles.

Failures: Ukraine exposed vulnerabilities by targeting S-400s with low-altitude cruise missiles (e.g., Storm Shadow), drones, and ATACMS. 
For example, in April 2024, ATACMS strikes in Crimea destroyed S-400 launchers and radars, exploiting gaps in short-range protection.

Tactics: 
Ukraine used decoys and saturation attacks to overwhelm S-400 radars, forcing Russia to pair them with Pantsir or Tor systems for better low-altitude coverage.

India Pakistan - India used s400 successfully against Pakistan .

What Happens During Combat

Strategic Impact:  
The S-400 creates a no-fly zone within its range, deterring enemy aircraft and forcing them to use longer, riskier routes or standoff weapons. 
For example, India’s S-400s along the Line of Control cover much of Pakistani airspace, complicating their air operations.

Its presence signals resolve, as seen in Syria, where it limited U.S. and Israeli freedom of action.

Tactical Dynamics:  

Offensive Threat: The S-400’s long range allows it to engage high-value targets like AWACS or refueling tankers, disrupting enemy air campaigns.

Defensive Role: It protects key infrastructure (e.g., Moscow, military bases) by intercepting missiles and aircraft before they reach their targets.

Countermeasures: Enemies use electronic warfare, decoys, or low-altitude tactics to evade detection. For instance, Ukraine’s success with ATACMS shows the S-400 struggles against terrain-masking missiles.

Limitations in Action:  

Low-Altitude Threats: Cruise missiles and drones flying below 100 meters can exploit radar blind spots, as seen in Ukraine.

Saturation Attacks: Overwhelming the system with multiple targets (e.g., drone swarms) can exhaust missile reserves or confuse radars.

Dependency on Network: Without short-range systems (e.g., Pantsir) or AWACS, the S-400 is vulnerable to close-in threats or blind spots.

Operator Skill: Effectiveness depends on crew training and integration with other defenses, as poorly coordinated systems led to losses in Ukraine.

Aftermath:  
Successful engagements enhance the S-400’s reputation, as seen in Russian marketing after Syria. Failures, like Ukraine’s strikes, expose weaknesses, impacting export credibility.

Destroyed systems require costly replacement (a battalion costs ~$200 million), straining resources, as Russia experienced in 2023–2024.

Critical Analysis
The S-400 is a formidable system when used in a networked, layered defense with proper support (e.g., Pantsir, AWACS). 
Its ability to engage multiple targets at long range makes it a strategic asset, but it’s not invincible. 
Combat experience in Ukraine shows that low-altitude threats, saturation attacks, and SEAD tactics can neutralize it if not adequately protected. 
Its effectiveness also depends on terrain (e.g., flat areas like Crimea maximize radar range, while mountains create blind spots) and operator proficiency.

Watch Video -  S400 missile System & Air Defence Missiles | How it Works