tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post4410196537816856765..comments2024-03-29T13:49:05.810+05:30Comments on Reality Views : India – Creation Of Small States – Need of the Hour For INDIASMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08421656022621802223noreply@blogger.comBlogger37125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-5098001942435232032016-02-24T19:28:23.170+05:302016-02-24T19:28:23.170+05:30Hi there to all, how is all, I think every one is ...Hi there to all, how is all, I think every one is getting more from this web site, and your views are fastidious for new people.<br />ثبت علامت تجاریhttp://brandclinic.ir/registered-trademarknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-32228396579869056062012-02-27T16:58:59.314+05:302012-02-27T16:58:59.314+05:30Good Article.
Gorkhaland demand in India is now 1...Good Article. <br />Gorkhaland demand in India is now 107 years old, but why is this demand not full filled till date, are not we living in the world's democracyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-46534392846329935862011-11-21T00:21:00.317+05:302011-11-21T00:21:00.317+05:30vikasthakur910,,thanks.
Anonymous, thanks.vikasthakur910,,thanks.<br />Anonymous, thanks.SMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08421656022621802223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-29581632362995346222011-11-20T20:41:49.781+05:302011-11-20T20:41:49.781+05:30So, Now I find that Mithila state should be curved...So, Now I find that Mithila state should be curved out of BIHAR...<br />Jai Mithilavikasthakur910@gmail.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04083899306017113097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-70662074359496732502011-11-17T02:24:21.653+05:302011-11-17T02:24:21.653+05:30Hey SM, This was really a good article. I liked it...Hey SM, This was really a good article. I liked it more. The more funny part is the comments :-). I have seen some comments which will show/prove how educated people will behave like illiterate. If they have read your article precisely and understood each and every point they need to comment on it instead of saying it as good article. The problem with this kind of people is they think they know everything but they really don't know anything. I don't want to debate on this... Good Research Keep it up...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-88243293383588393072011-08-02T00:11:58.167+05:302011-08-02T00:11:58.167+05:30Anonymous,,
thanks.Anonymous,,<br />thanks.smnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-20747304846813451292011-08-01T16:27:09.337+05:302011-08-01T16:27:09.337+05:30Very unconvincing.
It maybe a ploy by the ISI to ...Very unconvincing.<br /><br />It maybe a ploy by the ISI to divide India, to destabilise it. ISI can do anything.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-78465150842964033352010-12-31T06:39:35.096+05:302010-12-31T06:39:35.096+05:30Ashutosh,
Thanks.
Please read the history again ca...Ashutosh,<br />Thanks.<br />Please read the history again carefully.<br />How many states is America?<br />Does china got the democracy?<br /><br />After Independence India divided states on the basis of language, indirectly on the basis of caste system.<br /><br />That time in the year 1953 Fazal Ali commission, the states Reorganization Commission was formed by Prime Minister.<br /><br /> The commission created a report in 1955 recommending the reorganization of Indian state. <br /><br />This commission said that and recommended that Telangana should not be merged with the Andhra Pradesh. <br /><br />This should be decided by the people of the Telangana.<br />Uttar Pradesh with population of more than 167 million is bigger than Germany + France or Russia ,Pakistan<br />China, America, Brazil and Indonesia are the only few nations who are bigger than Uttar Pradesh.<br />TamilNadu (62.2 million) is bigger than Britain and Italy,<br /> Andhra Pradesh (76.4 million) is little bigger than Germany and Vietnam <br /> Bihar is bigger than Mexico<br /> Maharashtra with 92.1 million is bigger state than Germany.<br /> Maharashtra has ten million more than Germany.. <br />Bengal is bigger than the Philippines<br /><br />Hope this will clear your doubts.<br />Feel free to ask again.smnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-70613656125459788962010-12-31T00:38:26.059+05:302010-12-31T00:38:26.059+05:30Ok! I AGREE ON MOST OF YOUR ARGUMENTS, BUT STILL I...Ok! I AGREE ON MOST OF YOUR ARGUMENTS, BUT STILL I HAVE ONE THING IN MIND.<br /><br />telengana was under control of nizam's and andra was british colony. because telengana was part of monarch, it could never grow(on grounds of literacy, culture and many other aspects except economy) where as andra was ahead of its times. now merging of these two state was a ingenious decision because they could exchange there resources and knowledge to become a prosperous state. but unfortunately it never got right candidate(politician) for that purpose. <br />all the time politicians wanted to separate it. if they have so much guts to separate and develop 2 small states then why no use that energy to develop 1 state as a whole.<br />its never too hard to develop a state no matter what its size is.<br />we have eg. of china, gujarat, punjab, states of USA, Canada, and many more. all these states are developed, yet have huge size and good ratio of population.<br /><br />mere size and population is never an issue in case of development.<br />separatists always provoke war to rule. people like Potti Sriramulu gave their life to keep states together.Ashutoshnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-36420179021864112672010-06-08T17:09:51.033+05:302010-06-08T17:09:51.033+05:30V online,,
thanksV online,,<br />thankssmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-80669359960633682512010-06-08T14:34:49.545+05:302010-06-08T14:34:49.545+05:30Anonymous,
thanksAnonymous, <br />thankssmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-19253900163279084572010-03-19T00:47:20.802+05:302010-03-19T00:47:20.802+05:30Loved reading it!!Loved reading it!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-2135650896389123702010-03-07T15:28:20.814+05:302010-03-07T15:28:20.814+05:30Neha
Just think that A who is more powerful ,a own...Neha<br />Just think that A who is more powerful ,a owner of small scale industry or multinational company ?<br />The chairman of the small bank or chairman of the multinational bank.<br />Politician chief minister of big state or small state ?<br />Who can do more corruption CM of big state or Cm of small state ?<br />As a citizen we do not even know how our Municipal corporation works , so what is use of cm and his office if we can not reach to his office because we do not have money or knowledge how it works.<br /><br />Just think the benefits of small states and you will get the idea what small states mean for India.<br /><br />What happened in the past we can not change it now we have to see the the powers of chief ministers get divided , we need more teachers and principals for our nation not one big <br /><br />we have to find the solution on the problems and one of the reform is creation of small states.<br /><br />in my future post which i am planning to write i am sure you will get the more insights.<br /><br />To understand that post once needs to know the correct history,which you know it .<br /><br />For me language is a tool to communicate with other human .nothing more.<br />reality is languages keep dying,as new methods are invented.smnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-73569346323022882212010-03-07T10:33:01.833+05:302010-03-07T10:33:01.833+05:30http://nehasilam.blogspot.com/2010/01/lets-communi...http://nehasilam.blogspot.com/2010/01/lets-communicate.html - the post link that I am referring toNehahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12210124858747262151noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-84282037851772510372010-03-07T10:31:49.299+05:302010-03-07T10:31:49.299+05:30sm, my point here is not about the divided India w...sm, my point here is not about the divided India which you have emphasized on..I don't believe at all that small states will divide India and make India weak..nor I believe that small states do not make progress..<br /><br />my point is simple - politicians are suggesting this division of states so that they get powers..they want their seat as a CM..for that, they create violation and hatred among people of the same nation..<br /><br />we made a mistake while creating states - we divided them on the basis of language..we are doing the same thing again..telangana people wanted THEIR state..now comes Vidarbha..<br /><br />and you are talking about more states communicating in same language - we are not spreading the same language across all the nations..Gujarat or Andra won't communicate in Marathi and vice versa..<br /><br />all we are doing by dividing states is giving birth to more politicians..if we are lucky; they will be good..or we are not better or worse off at this moment too..<br /><br />you know, I wrote one post on Language; where I just expressed my opinion about how we can at least try to solve the problem of language barrier in our own country where we misbehave with our country people only because they do not know the local language..you should see the comments I got there..instead of talking about solution, people made it an ego issue..tamil people started bashing north ones and vice versa..<br /><br /><a rel="nofollow">Let's Communicate</a><br /><br />I guess long enough comment already.. :)<br /><br />but I quite appreciate your research and clarity of thought..I am fine with big/small - any kind of nations..my problem is corruption/personal benefits of politicians at the stake of people - that's all..Nehahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12210124858747262151noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-63491066864851629572010-03-06T15:51:20.022+05:302010-03-06T15:51:20.022+05:30excellent articleexcellent articlekhannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-22650768250629366302010-02-20T01:01:31.598+05:302010-02-20T01:01:31.598+05:30Jashan
thanksJashan<br />thankssmhttp://realityviews.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-12699610588812821102010-02-17T18:53:10.889+05:302010-02-17T18:53:10.889+05:30Hi
Ajit and SM many thought provoking points. I...Hi<br /> Ajit and SM many thought provoking points. I believe small states are absolutely a need for the hour. Kindly note that once Uttarakhand, Jharkhand & Chhattisgarh were formed they have done much better than the national average consistently. Bihar which also came near a management zone (MP's or DM's between 5 to 25)they have done better than a combined state. UP which remains big still remains in a bad state. I have tried to analyze all these points in my blog<br /><br />http://jashan-celebrating-life.blogspot.com/2010/02/does-india-needs-more-states.html<br /><br />People interested in the topic can take out some time and read it. I have tried to analyze from both the sides. Comments are most welcome<br /><br />Regards<br />Jashan<br /><br />PS: My name is Jashan and not Jashan83 :)Jashan Gillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00266647933395426960noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-90373953131362233592010-01-24T07:01:09.240+05:302010-01-24T07:01:09.240+05:30Ajit Singh
thanks
To show the progress i have writ...Ajit Singh<br />thanks<br />To show the progress i have written about the GDP rates which were given by the times of India, try to find the GDP on government websites and you wont find them eaisly .<br />so point is clear that small states make the progress.<br />Today our system is so corrupt that one honest cm can not change it.<br />It is better to divide the powers of chief minister who are becoming so rich and powerful that we are unable to reach them or there office.<br />and also we are so fearful that media also thinks thousand times before writing the truth about the politicians.<br />when powers will be limited, he will king of small state, so his money making capacity will be limited, and his criminal raj will be limited.<br />what is the reason we are moving to nuclear families ?<br />what is the reason we demand small class rooms ?<br />what is the reason we demand that in each class room there should not be more students ?<br />what is the reason educated Indians are moving to rule hum do hamara Ek, <br />Think on the point that when one language speaking state will be divided into two states, who will suffer, regional parties will suffer more.Regional parties are not supporting small states, Bjp is supporting small states,<br /> mns and shivsena both oppose the small states,<br />Try to write a post on disadvantages of small states and you will get the picture .<br />Do not mix language and small state creation regarding language they are making us fools so just ignore it.smnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-7755230161685416562010-01-20T15:31:55.799+05:302010-01-20T15:31:55.799+05:30Bihar has progressed coz of an honest CM and not b...Bihar has progressed coz of an honest CM and not by getting divided. You blame politicians for being dishonest and you seem to be supporting their view to create new states! Do you really think that they want new states to bring about progress? They just want to make vote banks for themselves so that they can be in power at the centre and divert funds to their states and again do corruption! <br /><br />Language problem is just a political gimmick. Like the demand for new states.. do u think that the masses care if the language is hindi or something else or where the states boundary ends? They just want the basic necessities of life, that’s it. Politicians rouse emotions by talking on these subjects just to get their vote banks!<br /><br />If CM’s want to work they can do it not matter what the size. <br />The logic that people can ask questions is idealistic. When was the last time the ministers listened to the masses??? If u say that people will question, then if bigger the state, more is the population so more should be the questions, Does it happen? Or does it happen even in the smaller states?? Get realistic not idealistic!! <br /><br />Just the area is shortened, the powers of the CM’s remain the same. Answer this: would u be more powerful if u are allowed to rule a small village or a big dictrict?<br />I think a village. Coz small the area, more powerful you can be, u can keep people in fear. Coz they know they don’t have any option as less will be the candidates. It is easy to manipulate at small scale that to do it at a large scale. Eg: the traffic police can take bribe any time and go scott free, but the DIG cant take bribes at the “same frequency”(I am not talking about the “size of the bribe”). So who misuses the power most? <br /><br /><br />By making new states you are not changing the system, infact you are multiplying the system!<br />We have been waiting for the ONE HONEST CM since ages, none have arrived?<br />Police is the tool of the incumbent CM to rule. So why will they reform it?<br />You want to divide by expecting an HONEST CM when the history shows exactly the opposite.<br />I am not against hoping for the good. Its just that we must put are hopes in some other direction where there is a ray of hope!<br /><br /><br />Please don’t just blindly quote TIMES OF INDIA. Times is always known to have biased, Capitalist, and govt friendly views. <br />About MNS I want to say that where is the Chief now that the elections are over. The chief people demanding the new states will do the same once their political goal is achieved. We have to learn by looking at other fields (lateral thinking!).<br /><br />Thanks!<br /><br />Visit!<br /><a href="http://adotk.blogspot.com/2009/12/mns-divides-nation.html" rel="nofollow">Nation Divided</a><br /><br />http://adotk.blogspot.com/2009/12/mns-divides-nation.htmlAjit Singhhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06013090680913963014noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-8768298770133829362010-01-20T02:45:36.755+05:302010-01-20T02:45:36.755+05:30Money is not reaching to the poor the real cause i...Money is not reaching to the poor the real cause is our system, without change in the system and laws we will never make progress, SC has recommend many changes but no state is ready to implement them, when small states will be there, there will be more chief ministers in India, and there, we may get one honest chief minister who can implement those reforms like police reform.<br />Progress is equal to honest IAS, IPS officers + honest chief minister<br />Then state may be small or big it does not matter.<br />When every one is corrupt, small state matters lot, if you will see and study u will realize that it is easy to expose corruption in small state not in a big state.<br />Eg. Koda, what happened to the big state corruption you know it, chara or bofors became real chara.<br /><br />http://realityviews.blogspot.com/2009/12/india-creation-of-small-states-need-of.htmlsmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-70170943069335157192010-01-20T02:32:35.480+05:302010-01-20T02:32:35.480+05:30India achieved record annual GDP growth, averaging...India achieved record annual GDP growth, averaging 8.45%, in the five years, 2004-05 to 2008-09<br />Bihar averaged 11.03% growth annually. It was virtually India’s fastest growing state, on par with Gujarat (11.05%).<br />Uttrakhand (9.31%), Orissa (8.74%), Jharkhand (8.45%) and Chhattisgarh (7.35%), have all grown faster than the standard miracle benchmark of 7%.<br />Uttar Pradesh, a huge, poor state of almost 200 million people. The excellent news is that UP’s growth rate has risen impressively to 6.29% annually and Madhya Pradesh (4.89 %).<br />Uttrakhand and jharkhand have grown as fast as or faster than the all-India average of 8.49%.<br />Reported by times of India.<br />Now progress is of India is not reaching to poor people.<br />Only 30% Indians are enjoying this growth.<br />Creation of small state and language problem are different do not mix them<br />As u said about MNS, you should know that MNS is against the creation of small states.<br />About Pakistan please you see it what I said you are supporting that same.<br />American constitution started its progress in the year 1689 we started in the year 1948 or we can say 1935.<br />The United States Constitution was adopted on September 17, 1787,<br />Your logic is totally wrong , as MNS is aganst creation of small states.<br />You should understand the logic is that more big state, more power to chief minister ,more chance to do corruption, when we are making small state it will cut the hands of chief minister ,this means his working area will be limited , and people can ask him questions.<br />We are not dividing India, we are just limiting, cutting the power of chief minister and his office.<br />Language parties , regional parties will find it more difficult to survive in the small state .<br />As progress will automatically become the norm not language, as people will understand the real cause why they are not making progress, and why only there political leader is making progress and money.smnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-53959390400208554062010-01-11T01:18:53.803+05:302010-01-11T01:18:53.803+05:30Jharkhand has 24 districts, 211 blocks and 32, 620...Jharkhand has 24 districts, 211 blocks and 32, 620 villages out of which only 45% are electrified while only 8,484 are connected by roads. Jharkhand is the leading producer of mineral wealth in the country, endowed as it is with vast variety of minerals like iron ore, coal, copper ore, mica, bauxite, graphite, limestone, and uranium. Jharkhand is also known for its vast forest resources. are electrified while only 8,484 are connected by roads. Jharkhand is the leading producer of mineral wealth in the country, endowed as it is with vast variety of minerals like iron ore, coal, copper ore, mica, bauxite, graphite, limestone, and uranium. Jharkhand is also known for its vast forest resources. In last 61 years only 45% is electrified.<br />11. How can we compare the newly formed state with the other states which are 61 years old. How can we compare the 10 year with 61 year.<br />12. Jharkhand has a population of 26.93 million,<br />13. Jharkhand's poverty rate, while still high by Indian standards, has declined by 2% per year between the periods of 1994-2002.<br />14. The literacy rate in Jharkhand is 59.6% (2007). As per the 2001 census conducted by Government of India the official literacy rate for the state was 54.13% (Male: 69.74%; Female: 39.38%) with 5 districts above the average literacy rate<br />15. Jharkhand has made primary education so accessible that 95% of children ages 6–11 are enrolled in school as opposed to 56% in 1993-94,<br />16. Its nominal per capita income (($314 in 2003/04) is low (only 55 percent of the all-India average), though not the lowest among the major Indian states. It is actually higher than the per capita income of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh (UP)<br />17. Please read the both articles which I have written more carefully get facts more correctly and I will again read and write more.<br />18. http://realityviews.blogspot.com/2009/11/india-independence-and-hindi-language.htmlSMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08421656022621802223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-74534146340811181722010-01-11T01:15:14.968+05:302010-01-11T01:15:14.968+05:30Ajit Singh,
1. My point is that before the Arrival...Ajit Singh,<br />1. My point is that before the Arrival of British People there was no India present.<br />India took birth after the arrival of British Rule.2nd is the Asia was ruled by Hindu Kings But that time there was no thought of India. Or one nation.<br />This is the concept of one nation, nation a family, a nation is one nation when someone attacks on one part, whole nation sends there sons and daughters to save the nation.<br />But before the arrival of British Rule this never happened in India, Muslim Arab came from outside fought with 1 Hindu King and that same time other king neighbors enjoyed there life without doing anything. So I that time we were divided. Now after the formation of India, we are dividing the power of chief Minister, we are not giving them freedom or Independence. We are just dividing the state into the small states.<br />No one is giving them Independence from India. Division among the state is different from the Independence of the state. First get the point clear that now after division of state, we are not dividing India. First be clear that we are not giving them Independence<br />This is just division of a state. I do not believe before arrival of British people there was India. There may be kings who were Hindu. I do not consider them Indian Kings.<br /><br /><br />2. Pakistan is a nation where one person becomes the head of all forces .there are other nations also. That is reason he becomes powerful than the prime minister of Pakistan. Also but I have to confirm that so I do not say, but I will mention it. The President of Pakistan serves as the Commander-in-Chief of the Army. The Chief of Army Staff (COAS), a General, is a four star commander and commands the Army. There is never more than one serving general at any given time in the Army. Only one officer have been conferred the rank of Field Marshal, a 5-star rank and the officer serves as the ceremonial chief.<br />3. Indian President is the rubber stamp; he is just for the name sake head of arm forces. There are 3 individual persons who are heads of each, army head, navy head, air force head, they report to the President of India and president of India indirectly reports to Prime Minister of India, President of India can not do anything without the permission of Prime Minister of India.<br />4. One head is one of the differences between India and Pakistan this is one of the reason Pakistan has seen Army Head ruling the Pakistan but in India this never happened as no Indian force head is as powerful as the Pakistan army Head.<br />5. China is not democratic nation so no comparison. About division of USSR you know it, and USSR was also not democratic nation.<br />6. Please read the History my one article so what MNS is doing you will know that is happening in India before the Independence . Below is the Link.<br />7. http://realityviews.blogspot.com/2009/11/india-independence-and-hindi-language.html<br />8. After reading this article you will know that what MNS is doing is nothing but copying what others have done before them in the past.<br />9. Please read the history of Indian language problem you will understand regionalism problem better.<br />10. Jharkhand was carved out of the southern part of Bihar on 15 November 2000. Jharkhand has 24 districts, 211 blocks and 32, 620 villages out of which onlysmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21409922.post-32395457721087538442010-01-11T00:22:23.749+05:302010-01-11T00:22:23.749+05:30Anonymous,
i have mentioned in the post that prog...Anonymous, <br />i have mentioned in the post that progress depends on the leader it does not matter state is big or small.<br />But it matters when we think about corruption amount.<br />when 1 state is divided into 2 states it may happen that 1 state has corrupt leader and other has honest or less corrupt leader<br />when state is big that 1 corrupt leader will do very big corruption.<br />when that state is not big that corrupt leader will do the corruption but amount will be small, and there will be chance that the corruption will be exposed more quickly.<br />as funds are less they cannot easily fool the population.<br />when state is big, the cm becomes so big that no one is able to ask him, and for him it becomes easy to fool the part of state by saying that he is funding other state, the chances and opportunities increase for him to fool the population of state.smnoreply@blogger.com